Thu, April 25, 2024

Real Talk Real Estate: Navigating the Proposed NAR Settlement: Separating Fact from Fiction in Real Estate

With the recent proposed settlement by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) in response to a class action lawsuit alleging antitrust violations, there’s been much speculation about its impact on the public and the real estate industry at large. Antitrust laws, designed to protect consumers from harmful practices like price-fixing or monopolistic behavior, are intended to ensure fair competition and transparency in the marketplace, particularly in sectors like real estate where significant financial transactions are at stake.

Amidst the media frenzy surrounding the settlement, it’s essential to separate fact from fiction and understand the potential implications for buyers, sellers, and real estate professionals. Contrary to sensationalized reports suggesting a dramatic shift in home pricing and savings for consumers, the reality is more nuanced.


As a realtor with firsthand experience in the industry, I can attest to the misconception that real estate commissions are simply tacked onto the sale price of a home. In truth, commissions are typically factored into a seller’s expenses, with the seller’s net proceeds determined by deducting all related costs from the home’s value. This includes not only the seller’s commission but also expenses such as closing costs and concessions, which are often used to cover the buyer’s expenses.

Historically, the commission structure has evolved to ensure buyers receive professional representation without bearing the upfront cost. Prior to 1994, buyers were largely unrepresented, with the seller agency dominating the landscape. However, changes in the industry have empowered buyers to choose their representation, shifting the burden of commission payments from buyers to sellers while maintaining the principle of buyer protection.

The proposed settlement may usher in changes to the traditional commission model, particularly in how commissions are advertised and shared among brokers. While the specifics remain to be seen, one potential outcome is the requirement for buyers to enter into agreements with their agents before viewing properties, mirroring the seller-agent relationship established in listing agreements.

For sellers, this change may not significantly impact the total expenses associated with selling a home, but could result in a shift in how concessions are structured and outlined in contracts. As for buyers, the decision to engage a buyer’s agent upfront or rely on listing agents carries implications for their level of representation and advocacy in the transaction.

While uncertainty and speculation abound, it’s essential to remember that real estate remains a cornerstone of the American dream, with homeownership continuing to be a shared goal for many. Despite the evolving landscape, Realtors remain committed to providing exceptional service and guidance to their clients, ensuring a seamless and positive experience in the buying and selling process.

As we navigate these changes together, let’s approach them with clarity, adaptability, and a shared commitment to upholding the integrity of the real estate industry and serving the best interests of buyers and sellers alike.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter for the BEST local business news delivered to your Inbox each week day.

* indicates required

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Posts

Women in Business: Alicia Fitts

Name: Alicia Fitts Title: AVP, Business Development and Community Relations for Peach State Federal Credit Union Start Date: January 2013 Phone:  678.889.4328 Website: Today’s Woman